The true challenge of the Coaching ROI (Return on Investment)For Coaches – For HR Managers – For Coaching Clients
André Politzer August 1st, 2007
ROI is one of the most intriguing topics for an executive coach working with Corporate.This is a challenging value that is often categorized as “intangible”.With my long executive experience in Corporate Europe and Corporate America, I appreciate and understand that most decision makers would be suspecting that the coaching impact can’t be measured on solid grounds until proven otherwise.After all, whoever would make the decision to hire a coach, has accountability for the engaged expense. and this one needs to be obviously addressed. Let me line up a few relevant outcome items from my first experiences of facing those objections. If organizations and practitioners work together to set standards and monitor activity, they will both benefit. From that standpoint, decision makers who are buying coaching have a responsibility to ensure coaching service providers that have the appropriate experience and qualifications. In the last four months, I have been focusing on how some organizations view measurement of their investment in their talent development budget. First the scope of application of coaching has been addressed. I can mention the following mostly common bottom line items those “prospective clients” mentioned during this exercise: -Improve individual/team performance-Improve productivity of the division (P&L) or global organization-Improve quality of interaction and communication between division leader and direct reports-Improve leadership/management effectiveness-Improve staff retention-Improve customer service and client retention-Establish a strategic planning dynamic-Improve emotional intelligence With HR managers I addressed their approach to coaching and found out that rather than being part of a development strategy, coaching help them truly maximize and harness their own departmental internal performance promoting efficient resources to their top executives and top performing teams, and furthermore provide additional savings in training and recruitment costs to the company. On the latter, by hearing several times that this is really a sensitive area for them, I could suggest we talk about the ROI applied to Coaching. It positions Human Resources inside the company and identifies the total financial benefit the organization draws like a learning/training program cost. We can subtract from that value the total investment it would take to develop, produce, and deliver that program internally. We had some challenges figuring out an exact measure of the costs associated with a training program and isolate the financial benefits from it. The suggested comparison was very well accepted and it was reasonable in the eyes of my HR contacts to assess this as a financial value. I suggested the following formula: (total benefit – total costs) = ____ X 100 = ROI
total costs
Total benefits would include the money saved by the organization, an allocation of a revenue increase for the division or the company, and anything that adds directly or indirectly to the bottom line.Total costs would include the development costs (using a comparable expense the HR or the division engaged in the past), the employee’s time away from doing something else, the overhead in education and materials, travel, cost of coordination, and any other cost incurred. The more I used that analogy to training cost and the more I could gain comparative benchmarks and a sincere recognition from the HR executive that we had room for creativity to find the tangible measure criterion applied to Coaching especially when it comes to the objectives listed above. Now, where do we go from here? As we relate to ROI and not to sales argumentation tips, I will add that it helps to show some evidence about value and not neglect to refer to standards such as the ICF (International Coach Federation) www.coachfederation.org and the coaching competencies, some of the mechanisms such as 360-feedbacks, project outcomes, coachees reports to their supervisor, etc. That process will build up over time generating some clear benchmarks the company will use along the way, when hiring external coaches. Surprisingly or not, some of the contacts I had during this process also expressed lots of skepticism and objections talking openly about their own experience of dealing with too many of what they called the “cowboys” coaches who use too much of “anecdotal evidence”. It made me feel each time I heard this kind of comment that it is crucial to agree on a definition for the ROI and offer one they can relate to a financial approach. For example:
- Return on Investment (ROI) is a traditional financial measure based on historic data. Coaching is a new topic for research and resources exist to find data and evidence on performance (provide them with some resources)
- ROI is a backward-observation metric that yields no insights into how to improve business results in the future
- In training, like in educational organizations, ROI has been used primarily for self-justification rather than continuous improvement. In Coaching, it’s all about continual improvement at the individual and group level
I was inspired to search for good ROI resources especially in the professional training space. There are websites and discussions dedicated to the topic and countless articles and reports, books and tools to justify and even calculate a Coaching ROI. Here are some practical examples I used in the Cyberspace. ROInet is a Yahoo! Group forum evaluating and measuring experiences shared with over 2,500 members: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roinet . It was created for HR professionals interested in measuring ROI in HR development projects. The ASTD (American Society for Training & Development) is the world’s largest association dedicated to workplace learning and performance professionals www.astd.org proposing a data-rich environment where you can find resources, discussion projects and issues related to measurement of ROI and it does not require any registration. I also found the American Evaluation Association www.eval.org an extremely relevant resource focusing a lot on HR performance evaluation tools. As a conclusion to this important topic, let me share a few tips I found useful when discussing ROI applied to Coaching:
- Make sure you discuss and agree the outcomes your prospect wants to achieve from coaching at the outset
- Make sure those are realistic, clear, and genuinely relevant to individuals and teams inside that organization (if you have the opportunity to evaluate that aspect directly with the stake-holder who will be involved with the coaching program, that will ascertain this crucial level of clarity)
- Record these outcomes as part of a potential “coaching contract” and it will be used as a basis for determining what has been achieved
- Try to develop some tangible measures like the examples I listed above
- Establish right from the inception of this relationship a process to review performance with the coach and the coachee at given times to make an ROI estimate
- HR and P&L Divisions are presenting budgets and forecasting to their supervisors. They are accountable for their expenses. Just keep it in mind and offer your support to provide all the tools and the resources needed to make a balanced mix of tangible and intangible criteria allowing to present a reliable ROI formula
The challenge for each of us is to avoid the assumption that our clients support our way of thinking. I suggest we try to appreciate all facets of our clients, especially when they are only prospects. Looking at the Return of their Investment on our services already makes them trusting we do care about their accountability.
Posted by apolitzer 